You are here

In re Brandon (Case No. 08-62969) 08/17/2009

The Court denied the debtor’s motion to reopen her case to amend schedules to add unnamed and previously omitted creditors because this was a “no asset, no bar date” case; consequently, creditors holding claims otherwise dischargeable had their claims discharged even if their claims were not scheduled and even if the omitted creditors had no notice of the case.  See 11 U.S.C. § 727(b).

 

Date: 
Monday, August 17, 2009
Category: 
Discharge
Dischargeability
Reopening/Reinstatement
Schedules
Chapter: 
7