Court held that debtor's motions to join counsel for the Water Authority and his firm as party respondents to the underlying motion, to disqualify counsel from continuing to serve as counsel for the Water Authority and to enter summary judgment against the Water Authority and its counsel were without merit and denied.  Debtor accused Water Authority and its counsel of attempting to perpetrate fraud upon him and the Court in connection with an exhibit filed with the Court relating to the due date for charges on an account the debtor had with the Water Authority.